Background Image
Previous Page  76 / 112 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 76 / 112 Next Page
Page Background

FOCUS

Soybeans

Mini

The national weighted average increased

slightly from 1,95% last season to 2,02%

this season.

The South African weighted average per-

centage soiled soybeans of 2,06% is the

highest since this survey was started in the

2011/2012 season when the average was

1,60%. The average last season was 0,77%.

Average weighted percentages per prov-

ince ranged from 1,28 in the Northern Cape

to 4,46 in Limpopo. Although the number

of samples containing soiled soybeans as

well as the average percentage soiled soy-

beans per sample increased significantly,

none of the percentages were above the

maximum permissible deviation of 10%

according to the grading regulations. Last

season, one sample from Mpumalanga

exceeded this limit.

Test weight, providing a measure of the

bulk density of grain and oilseeds, does

not form part of the grading regulations for

soybeans in South Africa. An approxima-

tion of the test weight of these crop sam-

ples was done by determining the g/1 litre

filling weight of each sample using the Kern

222 apparatus.

The test weight was then extrapolated by

means of formulas obtained from the Test

Weight Conversion Chart for Soybean of the

Canadian Grain Commission. The weighted

average this season was 70,9 kg/hl. Indi-

vidual values ranged from 64,9 to 73 kg/hl.

Last seasons’ values ranged from 63,3 to

78,2 kg/hl and also averaged 70,9 kg/hl.

Soybeans are the most important oilseed

crop produced in South Africa, driven

mainly by the demand for protein feed in

the animal feed industry. The nutritional

component analyses, namely crude protein,

- fat, - fibre and ash are reported on a dry/

moisture-free basis (db).

The weighted average crude protein con-

tent this season was 40,22%, slightly higher

than the 39,89% and 39,84% of the previous

two seasons. The sample from the North-

ern Cape had the highest weighted average

crude protein content of 41,56%, with Gau-

teng reported the lowest average, namely

38,86%. See

Graph 2

.

The weighted average crude fat percentage

of 19,4% compared very well with the 19,3%

in 2014/2015. The samples from KwaZulu-

Natal had the highest weighted average

crude fat content of 20,6%. The lowest av-

erage fat content was observed in Mpuma-

langa with 19,1%. See

Graph 3

.

The weighted average percentage crude

fibre varied from 6,2% in Limpopo to 7,6%

in the Northern Cape. The South African

weighted average of 7,3%, was higher this

season than in the previous season, when

the average was 6,4%.

A small variation of only 0,05% is observed

with regards to the national weighted aver-

age ash content over the five seasons that

this survey has been conducted. This sea-

son, the average ash content was 4,61%.

Samples from the Northern Cape and Lim-

popo tend to show higher ash contents over

seasons.

The majority of soybeans produced/grown

in South Africa is genetically modified and

an estimated 95% of the area planted to

soybeans in South Africa was GM. These

soybeans have tolerance to herbicides

(chemical products used to destroy weeds,

but not the crop plants). Worldwide, GM

soybeans occupy 80% of the area planted

to soybeans.

15 (10%) of the crop samples were screened

by means of the EnviroLogix QuickComb

kit for bulk soybeans, to quantitatively de-

termine the presence of the CP4 EPSPS

trait (Roundup Ready®) and all the samples

tested positive.

The results of this survey are available on

the SAGL website (

www.sagl.co.za )

. The

hard copy reports are distributed to all the

directly affected groups and interested par-

ties. The report is also available for down-

load in a PDF format from the website.

Soybean crop quality overview of the 2015/2016 season

Graph 2: Average crude protein content per province over five seasons.

Graph 3: Average crude fat content per province over five seasons.

Augustus 2017

74

We are grateful to the Oil & Protein Seed Development Trust for financial support of these

annual surveys and to the members of Agbiz Grain for providing the crop samples.