Background Image
Previous Page  75 / 116 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 75 / 116 Next Page
Page Background

Ons handhaaf ’n uitstaande rekord van prestasie

in die nasionale sojaboonproewe, jaar na jaar.

Ons veelsydige pakket bied die optimale kultivar

om jou winsgewendheid te verbeter.

Sojabone waarop jy kan staatmaak.

® Geregistreerde handelsmerke van PANNAR BPK, © 2016 PANNAR BPK

2016/SOY/A/15

www.pannar.com infoserve@pannar.co.za

Saam boer ons

vir die toekoms

VAN PLAAS TOT

HUIS: ’N BEWESE

SUKSESREKORD.

UITSONDERLIKEPRODUKTE

ENGEWASPAKKETTE

ULTRAMODERNE

NAVORSINGEN

ONTWIKKELINGSTEGNOLOGIE

GEWASVOORSORG

OPTIMALISEER

PRODUKSIE

GEWASBESKERMINGS-

BESTUURSPRAKTYKE

73

FOCUS

Soybeans

Mini

Limpopo’s two samples had the highest average percentage

foreign matter. The weighted average percentage foreign matter in

the rest of the samples ranged from 0,54 in the Northern Cape to

0,95 in the North West Province.

The North West Province (18 samples) reported the highest weight-

ed average percentage soybeans and parts of soybeans above the

1,8 mm slotted sieve which pass through the 4,75 mm round hole

sieve, namely 2,15% and Limpopo (two samples) the lowest at 0,67%.

Mpumalanga, with the highest number of samples (77), reported

an average of 1,78%. The Free State averaged 1,77% (42 samples).

The national weighted average percentage increased from 1,36%

last season to 1,81% this season. No samples were received from

KwaZulu-Natal for the 2013/2014 and 2014/2015 seasons. See

Graph 1

and

Graph 2

.

Eight samples were submitted from Gauteng and the lowest

weighted average percentage defective soybeans on the 4,75 mm

sieve were reported on these, namely 1,51%. Mpumalanga report-

ed the highest percentage of 2,12, followed by the Northern Cape

and the North West Province with 2% and 1,99% respectively. The

national weighted average increased from 1,07% in the previous

season to 1,95% this season.

The South African weighted average percentage soiled soybeans

of 0,77% was lower than the 0,89% of the previous season but

higher than the weighted average (0,41%) of the 2012/2013 season.

Average weighted percentages per province ranged from 0,38 in

the Northern Cape to 1,43 in Limpopo. This season one sample from

Mpumalanga had a soiled soybean percentage exceeding the maxi-

mum permissible deviation of 10%, none above the limit were ob-

served during the 2013/2014 season.

Test weight provides a measure of the bulk density of grain and

oilseeds and does not form part of the grading regulations for

soybeans in South Africa. An approximation of the test weight of

South African soybeans is done by determining the g/1 L filling

weight of the 150 soybeans samples by means of the Kern 222 ap-

paratus.

The test weight was extrapolated by means of the following formu-

las obtained from the Test Weight Conversion Chart for Soybean

of the Canadian Grain Commission: y = 0,1898x + 2,2988 (291 to

350 g/0,5 L) and y = 0,1895x + 2,3964 (351 to 410 g/0,5 L). The na-

tional weighted average test weight was 70,9 kg/hl and ranged from

63,3 kg/hl to 78,2 kg/hl. The national average the previous season

was 71 kg/hl, varying between 66,6 kg/hl and 74,7 kg/hl. The highest

weighted provincial average was reported for the samples from the

Northern Cape and the lowest for the samples from Limpopo.

The EnviroLogix QuickComb kit for bulk soybeans was used to

quantitatively determine the presence of genetically modified soy-

beans. The kit is designed to extract and detect the presence of cer-

tain proteins at the levels typically expressed in genetically modified

bulk soybeans. 15 of the crop samples were screened to test for the

presence of CP4 EPSPS (Roundup Ready) and all samples tested

positive.

All the soybean samples were milled on a Retch ZM 200 mill fitted

with a 1 mm screen, prior to the nutritional component analyses. The

crude protein, fat, fibre and ash are reported on a dry/moisture-free

basis (db) for the purposes of the survey. For comparison purposes

however, the national ‘as is’ basis results are provided in

Table 1

.

These ‘as is’ values were calculated using the weighted national

average values.

A look at the soybean crop quality