Previous Page  23 / 48 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 23 / 48 Next Page
Page Background

21

January 2019

INPUTS

ASSUMPTIONS

Yield

Increase with 10%

Fuel

Decrease with 50%

Fertiliser

Decrease with 50%

Lime

No change

Fungicides

Decrease with 50%

Herbicides

Decrease with 50%

Insecticides

Decrease with 60%

Burning of crop residues

No burning

% of the above ground residue removed 30% removed

TABLE 1: ASSUMPTIONS FOR INPUTS FOR FUTURE CA SYSTEMS.

REGION

FARMING SYSTEM

CONVENTIONAL

CA

FUTURE CA

Darling/Hopefield

Wheat

Wheat

Wheat

Medics

Medics

Lupins

Canola

Northern Swartland Wheat

Wheat

Wheat

Medics

Medics

Middle Swartland

Wheat

Wheat

Wheat

Medics

Barley

Canola

Southern Swartland Wheat

Wheat

Wheat

Medics

Medics

Canola

Canola

Western Rûens

Wheat

Wheat

Wheat

Barley

Barley

Canola

Canola

Southern Rûens

Wheat

Wheat

Wheat

Barley

Barley

Canola

Canola

Eastern Rûens

Wheat

Wheat

Wheat

Barley

Barley

Canola

Canola

TABLE 2: WINTER GRAIN SUB-REGIONS WITH CORRESPONDING

CROP ROTATIONS AND FARMING SYSTEMS.

REGION

TOTAL TONNAGE

CARBON EMIS-

SIONS FOR REGION

(KG CO

2

e/TON

GRAIN)

Darling/Hopefield

54 507

597,23

Northern Swartland

146 217

534,76

Middle Swartland

276 399

555,90

Southern Swartland

21 896

609,73

Western Rûens

182 449

637,92

Southern Rûens

209 245

485,85

Eastern Rûens

325 585

396,22

Weighted average

513,70

REGION

TOTAL TONNAGE

CARBON EMIS-

SIONS FOR REGION

(KG CO

2

e/TON

GRAIN)

Darling/Hopefield

58 993

339,93

Northern Swartland

157 914

327,68

Middle Swartland

307 043

314,72

Southern Swartland

22 283

400,70

Western Rûens

182 575

418,47

Southern Rûens

207 598

334,52

Eastern Rûens

315 426

276 38

Weighted average

327,83

TABLE 3: CARBON EMISSIONS PER TON GRAIN FOR CURRENT

SCENARIO PER SUB-REGION AND OVERALL.

TABLE 4: CARBON EMISSIONS FOR FUTURE SCENARIO

PER SUB-REGION.

Phase 1 was the start of a longer term

process of using the carbon footprint

methodology and results within the grain

industry as an adaptive management tool

(

Figure 1

).

Project scope and

methodology

The study only included activities and in-

puts at the farm stage of the grain value

chain. The methodology used to calculate

the carbon emissions per ton grain was the

PAS 2050: 2011 protocol developed by the

British Standards Institute (BSI). Carbon

emissions is only one of a range of impacts

that needs to be taken into account to obtain

a holistic view of the environmental impacts

of a farming system.

Winter grain sub-regions included in this

study are presented in

Figure 2

. Existing

data (inputs and yields) was collected from

representative production practices in each

region to model the current scenario of car-

bon emissions.

The current scenario consists of a combi-

nation of conventional and conservation

agriculture farming systems (current CA)

currently practiced in these regions. For

the future scenario, an ideal but realistic CA

system (future CA) predicted to be adopted

by most grain producers 20 years into the

future was calculated with corresponding

inputs and yields.

In the Western Cape there is currently no

big difference between conventional farm-

ing and CA. The conventional wheat farm-

ing system does not practise crop rotation

and therefore wheat is planted every year.

In the current CA and future CA systems

crop rotation is practised and the commodi-

ties included in the models per region were

wheat, barley, canola, medics and lupins.

All inputs were specified on a per hectare

basis. The carbon emissions (kg CO

2

e/ton)

per farming system were calculated from

the data provided.