Previous Page  55 / 132 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 55 / 132 Next Page
Page Background

53

on susceptible versus resistant cultivars. Field experiments were

conducted over four seasons at Roodebloem and Malmesbury

in the Western Cape. Two wheat cultivars namely SST 88 and

SST 056, which differ in their resistance to wheat rusts, were used in

all tests. SST 056 is moderately resistant to leaf rust and stripe rust

and moderately susceptible to stem rust. SST 88 is susceptible to

stem and leaf rust and moderately resistant to stripe rust. Different

fungicide treatments were applied at seven leaf and flag leaf growth

stages and finally, grain yields from fungicide treated and untreated

plots were compared.

Averaged over seasons and localities, fungicides resulted in varying

levels of yield increments compared to the untreated control on

the two cultivars. On both SST 88 and SST 056, Epoxiconazole +

Pyraclostrobin, Pyraclostrobin and Pyraclostrobin/Tebuconazole

provided better yields than the remaining treatments (

Table 1

).

About 0,571 t/ha and 0,285 t/ha yield increments over the control

were obtained by application of Epoxiconazole + Pyraclostrobin to

SST 88 and SST 056, respectively. Most of the remaining fungicide

treatments on the resistant cultivar SST 056 provided lower yield

improvements of less than 0,200 t/ha. Most fungicides which

increased yield, also reduced the severity of leaf and stem rust.

This suggests that the increased yield from fungicide treatments

was largely due to the effect of fungicides on foliar diseases. This

conclusion can be further supported by the higher yield response

recorded from the susceptible cultivar SST 88 than from the resistant

SST 056.

Economic analysis was performed to determine the benefits of the

different fungicide treatments on the two wheat cultivars. For this

purpose, average yields of each treatment over four seasons and

two localities were used. The profitability of each treatment was

calculated by subtracting costs of double fungicide application

from the gross benefit obtained by application of each fungicide

treatment. The gross benefits were calculated based on average

wheat price of R3 705/ton during March 2018.

Fungicide treatments resulted in different levels of profitability

(Table 1). On the susceptible cultivar SST 88, most of the fungicide

treatments resulted in positive net profits ranging from R121/ha to

R1 266/ha. However, a few fungicides gave negative net benefits

of R17/ha to R379/ha. Averaged over all fungicides and seasons,

application of fungicides to the susceptible cultivar gave an average

profit of R362/ha. On the resistant cultivar, only three fungicide

treatments out of eleven tested, gave positive net benefits of R26/ha

to R207/ha whereas the majority of the fungicides showed varying

levels of negative net benefits (losses). Averaged over four seasons,

application of fungicides to the resistant cultivar resulted in a loss of

approximately R250/ha.

These results showed that application of fungicide was profitable on

the susceptible cultivar while there was little or no benefit in applying

fungicides to the resistant cultivar. This indicates that when resistant

cultivars are available, they can be used for the control of foliar

diseases and protection of wheat yields and such resistant cultivars

may not require fungicide application. The use of fungicides should

be considered on susceptible, high yielding cultivars

which could suffer serious yield losses when disease

pressures are high.