Previous Page  76 / 132 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 76 / 132 Next Page
Page Background

September 2018

74

Towards more sustainable control of the

Russian wheat aphid

F

ollowing the release of the first Rus­

sian wheat aphid (RWA),

Diuraphis

noxia

(

Photo 1

), resistant cultivar

(Tugela-DN) in 1992, host plant re­

sistance has become the backbone of Rus­

sian wheat aphid control under dryland

conditions in the summer rainfall region.

However, since the arrival of the first aphid

biotype, RWASA1 in 1978, three subsequent

biotypes, RWASA2, RWASA3 and RWASA4,

have made their unwelcome appearance.

The development of these aphid biotypes

is not unexpected, as widespread deploy­

ment of host plant resistance implies evo­

lutionary adaptation, fuelled by climate

change and a higher selection pressure im­

posed upon the aphids by host plant resist­

ance (i.e., survival of only those individuals

that have the inherent ability to overcome

the resistance).

To counteract such selection, indiscrimi­

nate mortality inflicted by natural enemies

(predators, parasitoids and pathogens), is

seen as a critical component in a host plant

resistance x natural enemy-based control

programme. Pathogens are disease-causing

entities and include microbes such as fungi,

viruses and bacteria; collectively referred to

as entomopathogens.

As part of an integrated pest management

(IPM) approach against Russian wheat

aphid, ARC-Small Grain explored the com­

bined use of host plant resistance and the

insect-killing fungus (also referred to en­

tomopathogenic fungus),

Beauveria bassi-

ana

. These field trials resulted in about

65% fewer Russian wheat aphid in treated

plots compared to controls.

In an attempt to further improve this level

of efficacy, research was initiated on the

combined use of

B. bassiana

with botani­

cally based insecticides; potentially exploit­

ing any synergy between the two biocontrol

agents. Moreover, bio-insecticides are con­

sidered favourable alternatives to address

chemical insecticide issues relating to hu­

man poisoning, residues, environmental

pollution, insect resistance and negative ef­

fects on non-target organisms.

Notably, use of chemical pesticides may

negatively affect human health and bio­

diversity as it is estimated that less than

0,1% of a sprayed pesticide actually reaches

the target site; the rest ends up in the en­

vironment. Effective bio-insecticides can

ensure a better quality of life as many em­

ployees on commercial farms are confront­

ed by the risk of being exposed to sub-lethal

doses of chemical insecticides.

During 1990, 15% of South Africa’s entire

economically active workforce (1,18 million

people) were working on >62 000 South

African farms, while 20% of farm workers

involved in chemical applications were il­

literate (implying poor or non-adherence

to label warnings). In fact, in 2002, around

Focus

Integrated pest control

Nokulunga Mzimela

and

DR Justin Hatting,

ARC-Small Grain, Bethlehem

1: Russian wheat aphid,

Diuraphis noxia

colony, clustered on a wheat leaf.

Photo: Kobus

Dreyer, ARC-Small Grain

2: Flower of the Dalmatian chrysanthemum,

Tanacetum cinerariifolium

.

Photo: KENPEI,

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=2210117

1

2