Background Image
Previous Page  47 / 124 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 47 / 124 Next Page
Page Background

2015/IMAIZE/A/05A

www.pannar.com infoserve@pannar.co.za

® Geregistreerde handelsmerke van PANNAR BPK, © 2014 PANNAR BPK

Saam boer ons

vir die toekoms

Kies PANNAR se besproeiingsbasters vir buitengewone

resultate. Ons bied ook ’n verskeidenheid praktiese

boerderyoplossings en koste-effektiewe bestuur-

praktyke. Ons YIELDBOOST

swam- en

insekdoderspuitprogramme bied byvoorbeeld ’n

omvattende koste-effektiewe risikobestuurspakket

om die beste moontlike winspotensiaal vir jou

onderneming te bied.

Boere wat die

beste verwag,

kies die beste.

ULTRAMODERNE

NAVORSINGEN

ONTWIKKELINGSTEGNOLOGIE

GEWASVOORSORG

PRESISIE-

BEPLANNING

GEWASBESKERMINGS-

BESTUURSPRAKTYKE

45

The increase in yield during that time period can not only be attri-

buted to the new genetics in the maize seed, but also to the change in

the marketing system, higher potential soils, irrigation, the increase

in fertiliser application rates and precision agriculture.

Rate of yield gain

As mentioned, South Africa was one of the first countries in Africa to

commercially produce genetically modified crops and ranks eighth

in the world in terms of the sum of combined hectares planted with

maize, soybeans and cotton.

When South Africa’s “rate of yield gain” is compared to other coun-

tries (GM-adopters and non GM-adopters), one can see that South

Africa did fairly good in terms of “yield gain” from 2000 to 2012. The

rate of yield gain was calculated by making use of FAOSTAT’s data

and using a three month moving yield average for the year 2000

(average yield from 1998 to 2000) and 2012 (average yield from

2010 to 2012).

These average yields were subtracted and are depicted in

Graph 5

.

Two main points occurred from this graph; firstly, it is very surpris-

ing to note the small yield gain of the USA during this time period;

secondly, the yield gain in general was higher for the GM-adopter

countries in comparison with the non GM-adopters.

Note: Yield improvements are not only attributed to genetics, but

also management and the environment (biotic and abiotic), as well

as the interactions between these components.

Graph 4: Long-term maize yield for South Africa.

Source: Crop Estimates Committee and own calculations

Graph 5: National average rate yield gain of maize (2000 - 2012).

Source: FAOSTAT, 2014