Previous Page  27 / 84 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 27 / 84 Next Page
Page Background

Product information

25

April 2018

Planting less

Other structural solutions would be either

planting less or increasing demand in the

country.

Export destinations

Our exports have traditionally flowed re-

gionally, cross-border but exports are

moving sideways at present (

Graph 3

and

Graph 4

). Recent exports to Mexico could

be a once-off as the USA usually supplies

them. In most instances we are competing

with the USA, so South African producers

are always on the back foot.

Other influences

Freight spreads – cost of freight influ-

ences our ability to compete with the

competition.

China has a surplus of maize and partici-

pates in the market as an exporter not

an importer.

Protocols, biosafety and phyto-sanitary

regulations: Without agreements in

place no exports are possible. These

take time and require expertise.

Malaysia doesn’t like USA maize but

we still must compete with Brazil.

Iran is a good option but we’re still work-

ing on bio-safety protocols.

Vietnam is open to South African grains

and COFCO will ship there soon.

EU is not a logical destination in terms of

freight economics but we are shipping

there at present.

Venezuela imports 1 million tons/year

grains and is an attractive white maize

destination for our product. They pay

R300/ton premium and Jetten says

South Africa is close to agreement with

them.

The world is not waiting for South Afri-

can soybean exports. The product is not

well known and variation in quality is a

challenge.

Differentiation and cost

leadership

There is no great opportunity for differentia-

tion on any grain commodity:

Our maize product is considered best

in the world: Low moisture, low foreign

matter, minimal breaks but struggling to

get a premium.

Soybeans have variable quality and low

oil content.

Cost of moving grain in South Africa is

expensive.

Rail versus road: There is improved

movement by rail but there are limita-

tions to numbers of rail trucks on export

corridor (32 per day).

Terminals: Port logistics are not as ef-

ficient e.g. Argentina loads one vessel

per day, Durban loads the same vessel

in five days – this costs us.

Value-adding

Crush capacity

Increased crush capacity has absorbed in-

creased production – but not everything.

This limitation is based on the absorption of

local meal in the feed industry.

Vertically integrated

value chain

There are substantial volumes of frozen chick-

en imports. This needs to be stopped and

translated into local poultry production which

consumes locally produced grain. This would

make a significant impact and will assist both

maize and soybeans in local markets.

Ethanol from maize

Support for the ethanol industry is a logi-

cal choice.

Graph 4: South African yellow maize exports from 2011 to 2017.

Ronald Jetten

Graph 3: South African maize exports from 2011 to 2017.