Previous Page  54 / 84 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 54 / 84 Next Page
Page Background

RELEVANT

HAMISH MCBAIN,

retired executive, Tiger Brands

POLITICAL

analysis

South Africa:

This land is our land

I

n late 2017 South Africa came close to a ‘tipping point’ that

could well have resulted in an economic meltdown and wide-

spread unrest. The ANC is now deeply divided. On the one hand,

the Zuma aligned traditionalists, who seem to strongly believe

in the ‘big man’ concept so common in Africa. On the other, the

modernists who strongly support the Constitutional Democracy,

several of them former SACP members.

The election for ANC president at the December Conference was a

very close-run thing. Victory went to Mr Cyril Ramaphosa, the mod-

ernist faction candidate, by just 179 out of 4 701 votes cast. Half of

the elected National Executive Committee (NEC) remain strong tra-

ditional faction supporters, so the new leader must tread carefully.

Despite the urgent need for change, it is naïve to expect things to

happen quickly. Even positive moves mentioned at SONA, includ-

ing the reduction in the size of the Cabinet, productivity in the

SOEs and government departments, will be met with strong

opposition from within the party and the trade unions.

President Ramaphosa is also obliged to address the res-

olutions adopted at the ANC Conference, including the

new elephant in the room – land and expropria-

tion without compensation.

What is the real land issue?

This subject is fraught with intense emotion, and it means very dif-

ferent things to different people. Emotions are heightened by the

questionable statistics being bandied about; years of frustration

felt by many; and the clear failure of government’s land reform pro-

gramme.

The report back by the relevant commission at the National Elective

Conference led to frayed tempers and apparently a scuffle at the ple-

nary session. The adopted resolution warrants careful study.

Key statements in the resolution include: ‘Expropriation of land

without compensation should be among the key mechanisms

available to government to give effect to land

reform and redistribution’; ‘…we must en-

sure that we do not undermine further

investment in the economy, or dam-

age agricultural production or food

security. Furthermore, our interven-

tions must not harm other sectors

of the economy’; and ‘The ANC’s

approach to land reform must be

based on three separate elements:

Increased security of tenure, land

restitution and land redistribution’.

This is far from what the EFF is call-

ing for, but it also indicates that the

ANC itself does not really un-

derstand what is needed.

But what is the real land is-

sue? Is it about giving agri-

cultural land to people who

do not really want to farm? Will

the matter only be resolved by

Zimbabwe seizure of productive

farms and subsequent collapse of

the key agricultural sector? Why is Zulu

King, Goodwill Zwelethini, so up in arms

about expropriation without compensation?

Why South Africa will not be

like Zimbabwe

Mugabe and his ZANU-PF resorted to farm sei-

zures as a convenient way to regain lost votes

and eliminate a major source of opposition party

funding – the white producers. The ANC, conscious of

Mei 2018

52