Background Image
Previous Page  69 / 124 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 69 / 124 Next Page
Page Background

Cultivar 2, on the other hand, managed to

maintain its yield irrespective of the dis-

ease severity observed at dent stage, which

was as high as 60%. As however mentioned,

the hybrid in general had a lower yield

potential, which points to the ‘yield penalty’

that is speculated to be associated with the

incorporation of resistance into crops.

Although the findings discussed here only

represent one-year data, a number of im-

portant aspects were again emphasised by

the study.

Early infections will result in greater disease

losses. As observed during our 2016/2017

trials, the early planting were slow to develop

disease, most probably due to the climate

not being ideal for disease development.

The two susceptible cultivars (Cultivar 1

and Cultivar 3) at this point had very similar

yield losses (0,32% and 0,39% per 1% in-

crease in disease severity). With the second

planting date, the disease was already es-

tablished very early, resulting in Cultivar 1

having a higher rate of yield loss compared

to Cultivar 3.

Cultivar 2, initially included as a resistant

variety, ended up having a disease sever-

ity of close to 60% at dent stage of the first

planting, yet not suffering any significant

yield losses.

From this observation two things must be

highlighted. The first is that applying fun-

gicide on this cultivar did not significantly

increase the yield, even when compared to

the plots where the cultivar suffered almost

60% disease severity.

The second aspect is, however, that even

though it had resistance, the eventual yield

obtained was still lower compared to that

of the other two cultivars which were se-

verely susceptible.

Producers are welcome to

contact Dr Maryke Craven at

018 299 6100 with any further

questions.

Graan SA/Sasol photo competition

67

September 2017

Letsels op weerstandbiedende basters is

geneig om kleiner te wees en minder te

sporuleer.

Foto 2

toon ‘n tipiese noordelike mielie-

blaarskroeiweerstandsletsel wat op weer-

standbiedende basters voorkom. Die

siekte versprei nie so vinnig nie en skade

aan die blare is ook minder. Dit is egter

belangrik dat die produsent moet verstaan

dat die weerstand wat ‘n spesifieke baster

teen noordelike mielieblaarskroei het, kan

verskil tussen verskillende omgewings

– afhangende van watter noordelike mie-

lieblaarskroeiras dominant in die spesifieke

omgewing is.

Dit is raadsaam om uit te vind in watter

omgewing die betrokke baster aanvanklik

vir weerstand teen noordelike mielieblaar-

skroei geëvalueer is. Produsente word

aangeraai om verskillende weerstandbie-

dende basters aan te plant om sodoende

die risiko verder te verminder.

Voortdurende monitering van die mielie-

baster vanaf blom (veral by aanplantings

onder besproeiing), is steeds krities al

word daar van weerstandbiedende basters

gebruik gemaak. Sodoende kan die pro-

dusent nie onverhoeds betrap word nie.

Gedurende die 2016/2017-seisoen is 30 ultra-

kort mieliebasters in Potchefstroom ge-

evalueer. Die doel van hierdie proef was om

die mieliebasters te toets vir hul vatbaar-

heid vir noordelike mielieblaarskroei sodat

daar bepaal kon word hoe die verskillende

basters presteer onder die infeksiedruk

van noordelike mielieblaarskroeirasse wat

spesifiek in die Potchefstroom-omgewing

voorgekom het.

Omdat lokaliteit en seisoen ‘n rol kan

speel in die voorkoms van noordelike mie-

lieblaarskroei, het ons die siektegraad

wat gedurende die afgelope seisoen by

Potchefstroom waargeneem is, vergelyk

met die siektegraad wat waargeneem is

gedurende 2014/2015 tydens die evalu-

ering van LNR-kultivarevaluasieproewe by

Potchefstroom en Grootpan, onderskeide-

lik (

Grafiek 1

).

‘n Aantal nuwe kultivars wat nie deel

was van die groep wat tydens die

2014/2015-seisoen geëvalueer is nie, is

ook gedurende 2016/2017 ingesluit. By

Potchefstroom is daar oor die algemeen

soortgelyke infeksievlakke oor die twee

seisoene waargeneem, met enkele kultivars

wat gedurende die 2016/2017-seisoen

hoër infeksievlakke ervaar het as met die

2014/2015-seisoen.

Produsente kan hierdie inligting as riglyn

gebruik wanneer hulle met die onder-

skeie saadverteenwoordigers gesels en

besluite neem oor watter basters hulle die

komende seisoen wil plant. Deur kennis

te dra van die baster se vatbaarheid vir

noordelike mielieblaarskroei, sal produ-

sente meer ingeligte besluite kan neem

rakende siektebeheerprogramme vir die

komende seisoen.

Produsente is welkom om die outeurs van

die artikel te kontak by 018

299 6100 met enige verdere

vrae in hierdie verband.

Noordelike mielieblaarskroei-infeksievlakke

Yield loss associated with northern corn leaf blight