Background Image
Previous Page  24 / 44 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 24 / 44 Next Page
Page Background

Januarie 2017

22

ON FARM LEVEL

Natural resources and energy

These results were interpreted against guideline values (in the case

of inorganic constituents) or subjected to detailed risk assessment

methodologies (in the case of pesticides) so as to assess the poten-

tial risk of agricultural chemicals to human and animal health.

In addition, pesticides were prioritised based on quantity of use (QI),

toxicity potential to human health (TP) and hazard potential (HP),

which combine toxicity with environmental mobility. The data was

fed into an Excel-based risk indicator. When all three are combined,

the weighted hazard potential, which expresses the HP as a function

of the quantity of use of the pesticide, is determined.

‘It is a simple process enabling users such as water resource manag-

ers, catchment management agencies, water treatment works and

producers to prioritise pesticides at a national or crop-specific scale

according to any one of these indices.’

A further outcome of the study is a set of maps that give a spatial

overview of the likely distribution of specific active ingredients,

based on their application to crops and the distribution of those

crops throughout the country. It’s a first for South Africa. The maps

thus prioritise those areas that are likely to be of greatest con-

cern and can therefore make useful contributions to the design of

water quality monitoring programmes, interpretation of monitoring

data and as input into regional human health and ecosystem risk

assessments.

The impact of pesticides on human health

Concerning pesticides’ risk to human health, researchers actually

found levels to be ‘pretty low, with negligible risk associated with

consumption or use of water from the study areas’. Yet, there are

some warning signals. Despite the monitoring limitations mentioned,

the study revealed relatively high concentrations of particularly atra-

zine, terbuthylazine and simazine (all known endocrine disruptors) in

maize and sugarcane areas.

Samples collected in the Vals and Renoster rivers in particular

showed comparatively higher values than other study areas. Fur-

thermore, atrazine in particular was detected at similar concen-

trations over different seasons (wet and dry) indicating that it has

essentially saturated water resources in these catchments.

Though there was not much risk found from a human health per-

spective, it does require more research, particularly regarding

their potential endocrine disruptor effects, notes Dr Dabrowski. Bio-

assays conducted on water and sediment samples collected in the

study areas indicated ED activity on many occasions.

Dr Dabrowski cautions that it must be kept in mind that the re-

searchers did not look at all the listed pesticides and, where bioas-

says indicated endocrine disruptor effects, it was not possible to link

these to the use of a specific pesticide.

Pinpointing pesticide contamination

Maize is the most highly produced crop in South Africa and is

associated with high atrazine application.

A rural residential area with fruit orchards in close proximity.