Previous Page  30 / 116 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 30 / 116 Next Page
Page Background

Oktober 2018

28

Focus

Irrigation

V6

High quality information provided by ECa

measurements, laboratory data and geo-

statistical software can be used for ultra-

precision soil and water management:

Topography

: State of the art GPS tech­

nology, accurate to 1 cm, makes quality

elevation, surface drainage and slope

maps possible. This is important for

the management of surface runoff, in­

ternal and external drainage (

Figure 1

on

page 27).

Soil classification

: Since the identified

soil point represents 95% of the vari­

ation in the field, soils at these points

need to be classified and their physi­

cal conditions interpreted concerning

drainage, storage and root development

(

Figure 2

on page 27).

Waterlogging and salinity manage-

ment

: Salinity is an important, yet ne­

glected soil property. Salinity reduces

crop yield through an osmotic (drought)

effect and sodicity causes dispersion of

soil clays, soil structure degradation and

waterlogging – an important aspect for

irrigation producers (

Figure 3

and

Fig-

ure 4

on page 27).

Soil water storage

: The soil water

storage capacity can be determined

over the whole field using measured

physical soil properties as well as soil

depth. Identification of water manage­

ment zones guides the installation and

calibration of soil water probes. With

this knowledge irrigation can be done

more effectively (

Figure 5

on page 27).

Fertility management

: Using the op­

timal levels of nutrients in the soil as a

guide, fertility management zones can

be identified. Recommendations are

made to rectify imbalances in addition

to the crop requirement (

Figure 6

on

page 27).

Ultra-precision in ground truthing of soil

properties is now a reality through EMI

technology. For more information on the

field services (EMI survey), taking of soil

samples, soil classification, analysis of soil

fertility and soil physical properties, and

data visualisation in the form of attribute

maps, contact Lindi Smit at 076 897 1512 or

vanslab.africa@gmail.com

.

References

Amezketa, E, 2007.

Soil salinity assessment using di-

rected soil sampling from a geophysical survey with

electromagnetic technology

: A case study. Spanish

Journal of Agricultural Research, 5(1): 91 - 101.

Corwin, DL, Kaffka, SR, Hopmans, JW, Mori, Y, Van

Groenigen, JW, Van Kessel, C, Lesch, SM and Oster,

JD. 2003a.

Assessment and field-scale mapping of

soil quality properties of a saline-sodic soil

. Geoder­

ma, 114: 231 - 259.

Corwin, DL and Lesch, SM. 2005.

Apparent soil elec-

trical conductivity measurements in agriculture

. Com­

puters and Electronics in Agriculture, 46: 11 - 43.

Ultra-precision ground truthing

V1

0 mm - 300 mm

300 mm - 750 mm

750 mm - 1 500 mm

V2 V3

V4

V5

V1

0 mm - 300 mm

300 mm - 750 mm

750 mm - 1 500 mm

V2 V3 V4

V5 V6

3a

3b

2: Mobile sensor unit with EM38 sensor in

a cart, GPS system and base station that

enhances accuracy.

3a and 3b: Disturbed and undisturbed soil

samples.

CROP

TRANSECT SPACING (M)

ECA SURVEY DENSITY

Wine grapes

5

One measurement per 8,1 m²

Wine grapes

5

One measurement per 9,3 m²

Pecan nuts

12

One measurement per 17,5 m²

Lucerne

10

One measurement per 17,6 m²

Irrigated maize

25

One measurement per 43,1 m²

Dryland maize

30

One measurement per 79 m²

Table 1: Examples of EM field survey densities.

2