Background Image
Previous Page  26 / 112 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 26 / 112 Next Page
Page Background

FOCUS

Animals

Special

Oktober 2016

24

Conservation agriculture:

Ultra-high stock density grazing systems

T

his article highlights the methods of utilising crop species

that play an imperative role in conservation agriculture

(CA)-based crop-pasture rotations. Besides improving the

physical, chemical, hydrological and biological properties

of the soil, such species, including annual or perennial cover crops,

can successfully be used as animal feed.

Livestock production systems are in many ways dependent on the

utilisation of forage species, or pasture ley and cover crops (used

interchangeably in this article), and can therefore become an integral

component of CA-based crop-pasture rotations.

To qualify as a pasture ley crop, a plant species must fulfil the re-

quirements of a dual purpose crop, i.e. it must be functional for

livestock fodder and for soil restoration.

This article focuses on the components and value of multi-camp or

ultra-high stock density grazing (or so-called ‘mob’ grazing) as a pre-

ferred grazing strategy on pasture ley crops in an integrated crop

and pasture-based livestock production system. The term ‘pasture

ley’ can include a variety of annual or perennial species, legumes,

grasses or root forage crops used in short- or long-term rotations.

It is therefore important to distinguish between a short-term and

long-term ley cropping system.

Ultra-high stock density grazing systems

This grazing management practice is generally characterised by

high stock density (i.e. number of animals/unit area) in a small

camp of mature forage and short grazing periods and most impor-

tantly long forage recovery (regrowth) periods.

These grazing systems have a few key benefits and include:

Improved soil quality.

Improved forage quality.

Reduced selective grazing.

Increased pasture productivity.

Reduced weed problems.

Minimised equipment costs.

Increased diversity of plant species.

More uniform manure/urine deposition.

Increased harvest efficiency.

Increased livestock production per unit area.

Reduced hay and feed costs.

So how does it work? One has to approach this grazing strategy

with a large animal herd migration, such as those of the Serengeti

wildebeest, in mind. The system is mimicking how huge herds of

these animals used to move through an area, trampling and grazing

all around them before they departed – literally – for new pastures,

leaving the grasses to grow, mature and produce once more.

These animals freely grazed and never stayed in one area for too

long and then moved once the area is soiled with manure and

urine. These animals often did not return for months or even years,

which allowed the lands to rest and recover. When these pastures

are given time to rest after defoliation, new growth is stimulated

and pasture quality improves.

Grass plants have evolved over millions of years under such grazing

regimes and it is only during the past few hundred years that we

have started using enclosures (camps) and fields, exposing the

grasses to completely different grazing pressures, involving con-

stant grazing and re-grazing of the immature plants. Grasses and

other forage plants are poorly adapted to such treatments and con-

sequently productivity is much reduced.

So when one applies this strategy, the objective of such a system

will be to create smaller camps to be utilised by ultra-high stock

rates for short periods and then allow each camp to rest for longer

periods of time before returning animals to these camps.

Allowing plants to grow to maturity means that bulk grazers can

eat bulky forage material with a good combination of fibre, protein

and energy for the animals, resulting in much healthier animals.

Firm dung produced by the right nutritional forage quality can be

used by the producers as an indicator of good nutrition. Using this

mob grazing system to incorporate animals into an arable system

offer real environmental and financial benefits.

Management approach

To achieve success with such an ultra-high stock density grazing

system, it is advised to determine an optimal stock density

(animal kilograms per hectare). It is important to remember that

the higher the density of animals, the shorter the grazing period

and the more uniform the urine/manure distribution will be. This

method of organic fertilisation has a major advantage compared

to having to fertilise with inorganic fertiliser. The key is to utilise

smaller areas of pasture and ideally have multiple daily moves to get

the most out of your forage.

There are a few important holistic principles of successful ultra-

high stock density grazing management one should keep in mind,

which essentially aim to combine scientific principles and local

knowledge to adaptively manage animals so that the animals can

influence important ecosystem processes.

These principles are:

Efficient conversion of solar energy by plants.

Interception and retention of precipitation in the soil.

Optimal cycling of nutrients and promotion of high ecosystem

biodiversity with more complex mixtures and combinations of

desirable plant species (Teague

et al

., 2013).

There are, however, limitations when using ultra-high stock density

grazing practices. Firstly, the intensity of management increases

as the number of camps per herd increases.

WAYNE TRUTER,

University of Pretoria,

LINDEQUE DU TOIT,

Grass SA,

HENDRIK SMITH,

Grain SA,

GERRIE TRYTSMAN,

ARC-Animal Production Institute and

ANDRÉ LUND,

producer