November 2015
51
you can effectively be figuring out your soil’s quality and what the
plants and roots say about your soil. Walk your farm; choose the
best and worst places and observe soil profiles. An example of a
very practical test for producers is the “slaking test”, which makes
it possible to identify the quality of your soils in one easy exercise
(see
Photo 1
).
The jar on the left shows a degraded soil or “dirt” that collapses
when getting in contact with water, while a healthy soil on the right
infiltrates and holds all the water like a sponge.
Use appropriate indicators
Various speakers, such as Dr Rianto van Antwerpen (senior soil
scientists at SASRI) and Mr Victor Roberts (soil scientist at Cedara),
emphasised the use of an auditing system and/or indicators, meas-
uring the impact and progress of CA. Examples are: Soil struc-
ture, soil porosity, soil colour, number and colour of soil mottles,
earthworm counts and other soil fauna, soil cover at planting, crop
cover at six to eight weeks, soil depth, run-off and erosion, micro-
organisms and roots.
Again, it is of critical importance for producers to choose and use in-
dicators themselves, which will strengthen their discovery and learn-
ing process and help them to fully understand and take ownership of
important concepts and practices. This can even go as far as taking
a microscope to the field, identifying some of the weird and won-
derful creatures and very useful indicators, such as the Tardigrades
(commonly known as water bears or moss piglets) or soil mites (see
Photo 2
and
Photo 3
). Mr Ruhan Theunissen from Reitz, presented
how the quality of oil in a tractor’s engine could be an appropriate
“dipstick” to measure and compare between systems.
Understand soil life and biology…
And understand how to put that life
back into your soil
The pioneer CA producer from Winterton, Mr Ant Muirhead, widely
known as “Prof Muirhead”, supported by Prof Teague (see
Photo 4
),
called for the revival of soil biological capital, which is a subject
poorly understood by most, but central to soil health and sustaina-
ble agriculture. The growing academic understanding of soil biology
has slowly made its way onto producers’ fields. However, aggressive
tillage practices and excessive application of agro-chemicals, which
still prevails in most parts of the country, has largely destroyed our
soil biology. We will however have to put it back for CA systems to
function maximally.
1: A slaking test to assess soil health.
Photo: Hendrik Smith
2: Tardigrades, commonly known as water bears or moss piglets.
3: A soil mite, living in the upper layers of the soil.
Photo: Peter Webb
4: Ant Muirhead, Richard Teague and Phillip Theunissen participate in the panel discussion.
Photo:
Landbouweekblad
5: Beneficial mycorrhizal interactions with plant roots.
Photo: Dr Joanna Dames
“Producers could tap the multiple benefits of soil microbial sym-
bionts,” Prof Teague said. “We should be putting them back into
the game.”
One of the key concepts to understand and to repair is that of the soil
food web (SFW), which is the network and functioning of different
groups of soil biota and the connections between them. This process
is driven by photosynthesis, which uses carbon dioxide from the air,
combines it with water, and turns it into carbon, of which about 40%
is released as exudates by the roots into the soil, mostly in the form
of sugars, with some carbohydrates and proteins. These carbon
exudates are food or bait for soil microbes, which in return supply
soil mineral nutrients to the roots. Prof Teague discussed one of the
most important symbiotic relationships plants have, which is with
arbuscular (tree-like) mycorrhizal fungi. In this symbiosis the fungus
colonises two different environments – the roots of the host plant
and the surrounding soil – connecting the two with its long hyphae
(see
Photo 5
).
This enables the host plant to have an improved uptake of water and
mineral nutrients conducted along those hyphae. This relationship
has been documented in connection with many minerals, including
phosphorus, nitrogen, zinc and copper. One way of getting a handle
on soil biology, is to start measuring or analysing soil biological indi-
cators; some laboratories in South Africa have been rendering those
services for a while.
Weed management imperatives
A separate session on the challenges and solutions of weed and in-
sect management involved some agri-businesses in presenting their
best practices. As a summary of this session, Dr Charlie Reinhardt
(dean: Villa Academy), said that the benefits for sustainable crop
production that are associated with CA practices are unequivocal.
From a weed management perspective, however, it removes the im-
portant method of mechanical control from the producer’s “toolkit”.
This, to a large extent, makes practitioners of zero-tillage reliant on
chemical control (herbicides).
The practice of cover crops for weed suppression is gaining ground
in zero-tillage systems, for perfectly good reasons. It should be not-
ed that this biological way of weed management is mainly based
on chemistry. Dead plant material and live plants (weeds and crops)
exude biochemicals that can inhibit the growth and development of
not only plants (weeds and crops) but also micro-organisms. The
phenomenon is called “allelopathy”.
1
4
5
3
2