Previous Page  21 / 37 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 21 / 37 Next Page
Page Background

ႄႃ

CHAPTER 2

At the Maize Board’s 50th anniversary celebrations in 1985 it was described as an

indispensable link between producers and consumers. It was described as follows:

‘If it closes its doors tomorrow, South Africa would go hungry within a few days’.

However, it was clear even at that stage that the Maize Board would have to follow

an adaptable approach and be open to change in order to provide a more market-

oriented system for maize marketing. Some of the challenges for the Maize Board

were to make sufficient information available in such a market environment that

producers could align their production with market needs and reduce the cost of

handling, storing and distributing maize. In addition, it had to plan for the future

expected demand for maize, given South Africa’s changeable weather patterns

and rainfall, the expected increase in population numbers, diversification on maize

farms, an increase in productivity and other factors that could affect the production

of maize.

During April 1997 all the maize transactions in which the Maize Board was involved

were concluded, and on 30 April 1997 the Board ceased all its operating activities.

The Board continued until 2007 to manage outstanding matters, mainly involving

court cases, the selling of its assets and settling of pools.

With the final settlement of the export pool for the 1996/1997 season an amount

of R88,036 million was paid out on 14 August 1997 to maize producers who had

delivered maize to the export pool. This was the final payment by the Maize Board to

producers and that also concluded the Board’s commodity affairs.

Other products

In the course of time the Maize Board also provided assistance with respect to the

marketing of other agricultural products like sorghum (until 1986), potatoes and

dry beans (until January 1986), and buckwheat.

Buckwheat was administered in a single-channel pooled system from 1969 at the

request of the former Eastern Transvaal Co-operative. As in the case of maize, the

system applied to buckwheat that was produced in certain defined areas, although

virtually no buckwheat was produced outside those areas in any case. The single-

channel pooled system offered buckwheat producers the benefit of exporting their

crop over a longer period. This offered the opportunity to manage the marketing

so that favourable market prices could be utilised. Virtually the total buckwheat

production, except the seed portion, was exported, mainly to Japan and France.

The Maize Board marketed buckwheat on this basis until it was dissolved, but

potatoes and dry beans were marketed only until January 1986.

Sport promotion.

Advertising.

The transport of maize, buckwheat and sorghum.