Previous Page  19 / 37 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 19 / 37 Next Page
Page Background

ႃႋ

CHAPTER 2

NAMPO’s view was always that the government had to accept responsibility for the

deficit in the Stabilisation Fund, given the circumstances under and way in which

it arose. After many negotiations the government finally undertook in 1989 to take

over the deficit, which had been recorded as a loss in the Maize Board’s books.

Although the government accepted responsibility for the Stabilisation Fund, they

did not want to pass it on to the Treasury. The loss was therefore still recorded in

the Maize Board’s books, and interest was calculated on it annually, which meant

that it was included in the Maize Board’s budget.

The National Party-controlled government never settled that debt. After the

election in 1994 that brought the ANC-controlled government into power, a new

Minister of Agriculture was appointed. A delegation from the Maize Board led by

the Chairperson convinced the Minister that the government was responsible

for paying the deficit in the Stabilisation Fund, and it was at last settled by the

new government.

Levies

The maize industry was subject to three levies that had been introduced in terms

of the Marketing Act and/or the Summer Grain Scheme.

The first of these was a general levy introduced by the Minister in terms of the

Marketing Act. It was collected by the Maize Board, but paid over to the Department

of Agriculture to fund the South African Agricultural Union.

The second was an ordinary levy that the Maize Board charged in terms of the

Summer Grain Scheme to fund the Board’s administrative expenses like the cost of

advertising, administration, research, market information and distribution.

The Maize Board was also authorised, in terms of the Summer Grain Scheme, to

collect special levies on maize. The special levy was used to pay the marketing costs

the Board had to incur to market maize. This included the transport costs to ports,

finance costs, losses on exports, storage costs and handling costs.

When maize was sold to or through the Maize Board to a person who was not

registered for trading inmaize in the ordinary course of business, the levy had to be

paid by the seller (the producer). If maize was sold to a person who was registered

to trade in maize, the levy was payable by the buyer. However, no levy was payable

on maize that was employed for personal use by the producer.

Powers, duties and functions of the Maize Board

In addition to the ordinary powers required to carry out administrative functions,

the Maize Board possessed the following authority:

• To buy and sell maize and maize products;

• with the approval of the Minister of Agriculture, to prohibit the sale of maize

and maize products to any party other than the Maize Board or its agents or

registered maize traders, and charge a levy on maize that was processed or

bought from producers;

• to grant financial and other assistance with respect to research;

• to establish an information service in order to inform producers about marketing

conditions;

• to encourage the domestic consumption of maize and maize products and

promote the development of the maize industry in South Africa; and

• to advise the Minister of Agriculture on general matters like the grading require-

ments for maize, arrangements with respect to the import and export of maize

and maize products and, in general, the marketing and/or processing of maize and

maize products.

In addition to the functions of the Maize Board with respect to the marketing of

maize and other types of grain, it served as a material link in the maize industry in

various respects and various fields:

• The Board and its agents were responsible for the acceptance, grading, storage

and distribution of the country’s maize supplies. In this regard the agricultural

co-operatives played the main role, but the Board also appointed millers and