57
May 2017
Graph 2: Area planted per production area over seasons (South African wheat crop quality report 2015/2016 season).
decrease in the 2013 season, onwards (
Graph 2
). This coincided with
a drastic increase in the percentage of fields not infested by Russian
wheat aphid in these areas during the next season in 2014 (Graph 1).
There was a slight increase in the area planted with wheat in the
winter rainfall region during the 2014 season (Graph 2). This co-
incided with a gradual decrease in fields not infested by Russian
wheat aphid from 2014 to 2016, indicating an increase in Russian
wheat aphid populations in the Western Cape (Graph 1).
The arrangement of habitat patches in landscapes plays an impor-
tant role in determining the abundance and diversity of insects.
Insects will increase within an area that contain the most suitable
host plant and decrease with isolation of the patch. Wheat and
barley are the main host plants for Russian wheat aphid in South
Africa, but can survive on a few alternative host plants, including
oats, wild oats, false barley and rescue grass.
This aphid cannot survive on any of the other crop plants commonly
cultivated in South Africa. With a decrease in wheat cultivation in
the summer rainfall areas of South Africa, the habitat for Russian
wheat aphid became fragmented. Not only is there a spatial frag-
mentation, but also a temporal fragmentation when other crops are
planted in different seasons.
This resulted in Russian wheat aphid populations being limited to
certain habitat patches. At the same time, the beneficial insect/
pathogen complex associated with a wider crop spectrum in-
creases, thereby exerting additional pressure on the survival of the
pest species.
These observations emphasise the value of intercropping and
crop rotation in managing insect pests and can serve
as model for Russian wheat aphid management in
areas where wheat and barley are still the predomi-
nant crops.
1: Russian wheat aphid damage on wheat.
2: Russian wheat aphid population on wheat.
1
2