Previous Page  6 / 37 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 6 / 37 Next Page
Page Background

THE

GRAIN AND OILSEED INDUSTRY

OF SOUTH AFRICA – A JOURNEY THROUGH TIME

MAIZE

The following table contains a summary of the most important moments in the history

of the control over and gradual deregulation of the maize industry in South Africa:

1931

Mealie Control Act – export quotas

1935

Mealie Control Amendment Act, Maize Advisory Board appointed, control of maize exports

1937

Marketing Act

1938

First Maize Control Scheme established under the Marketing Act, amended from 1 May 1939

1944/1945 Start of single-channel marketing system for maize

1953

Establishment of Stabilisation Fund for Maize Board

1979

Summer Grain Scheme

1987

Summer Grain Scheme becomes single-channel pooled scheme

1994/1995 Deregulation commences with the implementation of a surplus-removal scheme, price floor

and export control

1995/1996 Partial exemption from export prohibition to trade – the Maize Board manages export pools

1996/1997 Maize marketing totally deregulated

1997

Maize Board abolished

The west wing of the Union Buildings, where the first meeting of the Maize Trust was held.

The government’s involvement with the maize industry was initially aimed at solving

problems resulting from climate factors. The first of these solutions was implemented

in 1916 in the form of loans to purchase supplies, seed, implements and fertiliser, and

later also for animal feed and transport costs for livestock.

In the 1920s producers generally obtained very good prices for their maize,

despite a reasonably large supply due to good harvests. However, by 1930 and

1931, during the Great Depression, maize prices dropped dramatically globally.

This, combinedwith good harvests in the 1931/1932 season, exercised tremendous

downwards pressure on the local maize price. Exporters were not directly

involved in the production of maize and had no incentive to export the surplus

when foreign prices dropped. The position was so critical that only two options

actually remained – government assistance or increased joint marketing.