data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/764f9/764f923ac22af33d36edbe508d2dd2e7ec265736" alt="Show Menu"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c115b/c115bd7e695d15ba9e3b77e554adecc54911405c" alt="Page Background"
THE
GRAIN AND OILSEED INDUSTRY
OF SOUTH AFRICA – A JOURNEY THROUGH TIME
ႃႂ
SAMSO intended to end the protracted disagreement between maize producers
and regarded it as its main task to establish all maize producers under its flag.
SAMSO’s operating structures consisted of local, district and regional maize
industry branches, the Executive council, the management committee and the
Annual Congress. The latter was accepted as the highest authority in the structure.
SAMSO’s structures made provision for membership for co-operatives that handled
maize. It was therefore not just a producer organisation. The co-operatives were
entitled to send delegates to the Congress, provided they were members of SAMSO
in their own right.
The establishment of SAMSO clearly indicated that the SAAU realised that a need
for a specialist organisation for the maize industry existed. The May 1978 edition of
SAMSO (the organisation’s magazine) reported as follows: ‘One should agree with
SAMPI that the idea of a specialist organisation was a bright one.’
SAMPI’s management was of the opinion that the founding of SAMSO was part of
the SAAU’s strategy to sink SAMPI. The emphasis of the fight consequently shifted
to which of SAMPI and SAMSO had to be supported as specialist organisation.
SAMPI found itself in a really difficult position after the SAAU’s strategic SAMSO
shift. This was aggravated by an order from Minister Hendrik Schoeman to all gov-
ernment departments and agricultural control boards to ensure that no exchange of
letters or interviews would in future be allowed with such organisations by officials
of the departments. No publicity was allowed to be given to the activities of these
types of groups through departmental publications or
Landbouradio
. SAMPI was
named as one of the organisations to which the order applied.
To counter this, SAMPI’s leaders among other things obtained approval from its
Congress to make a major effort to recruit members for SAMPI. During February
and March 1976 33 information meetings were held in the maize area, which were
attended in large numbers. SAMPI’s members were requested to resign from the
farmers’ associations of organised agriculture and establish SAMPI branches again.
SAMPI appointed organisers to run the recruitment campaign. They visited the farms
to recruit new members. In addition, various other methods and attempts were
employed to convince maize producers to join SAMPI.
On 19 August 1976 SAMPI addressed another request for affiliation with the SAAU,
among other things on the basis of SAMPI’s opinion that it was representative of the
majority of maize producers. The application was refused again and ostensibly the
chance of co-operation was lost.
Agreement 1976
However, in November 1976 Minister Schoeman convened a meeting with SAMPI’s
management committee and SAMSO’s management committee to sound them
out about the possibility of co-operation. Both organisations reacted very favour-
ably to this, to the extent that SAMPI’s management committee and SAMSO’s Ex-
ecutive met again nine days later and at the meeting signed an agreement that had
to serve as basis for unification.
An action committee was appointed and it was decided that the founding/establish-
ment Congress of the new organisation would take place during March 1977. The
date for the election of delegates to the founding Congress would be determined on
31 January 1977.
The process then started in all seriousness to join the two organisations under the
flag of the proposed organisation. This included decisions on the establishment of the
organisation’s office, starting a magazine, designing an emblem, funding, integration
of SAMPI members with structures of organised agriculture, et cetera.
Die Landman
of January 1977 carried a full article on the arrangements regarding
the new organisation. The first sentence of the article read: UNITY has been
achieved in the South African Maize Industry! Every person who produced maize
for marketing would be entitled to vote at the meeting of 31 January 1977 and
would vote in the magisterial district in which they lived or where their farming
interests were located.